Well: “A screaming comes across the sky. It has happened before [—]”
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
So. Okay. So I finished Gravity’s Rainbow on Friday night, and reread the opening section (and more than the opening section) on Saturday morning, resisting a compulsion to immediately return to the beginning.
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
So: Okay: Right?
The ending of Gravity’s Rainbow cycles back to the beginning (like Finnegans Wake): Blicero’s rocket, screaming across the sky—yes? no?—to invade the dreams (?) of psychic Pirate Prentice? The book: a loop, a Möbius strip, a film, its reels discombobulated, jostled, scattered…
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
“…it’s all theatre,” we learn on the book’s first page (page 3); the book ends in a theater—the Orpheus Theater!—where maybe scattered Slothrop is the leading man, scattered, we find ourselves in him, parts of him—where the audience demands, on the book’s last page: “Start-the-show!”
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
“You’re putting response before stimulus,” Spectro shakes his head at Pointsman, early in “Beyond the Zero,” the first section of Gravity’s Rainbow—does this describe the beginning/end of the novel? (“It has happened before”).
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
Or, a bit earlier even, at the seance, (page 32), Gloaming describes one kind of plot: “…we should get something like a straight line” — but then gives us another kind of plot — “…however we’ve data that suggest the curves for certain —conditions, well they’re actually quite different—schizophrenics for example tend to run a bit flatter in the upper part then progressively steeper—a sort of bow shape … classical paranoiac—” Is this the shape of Gravity’s Rainbow?
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
—but right this moment it’s that final dash that intrigues me—this in a novel full of dashes, this in a novel that name-checks Emily Dickinson, Eternal Empress of Dashes—the fragmented conclusion is full of dashes, lines obliterated by more perfect, straight lines, simultaneously connecting and disconnecting—like the novel’s final line:
“Now everybody—“
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
Or just the “Now—” of the little fragment before the final fragment “Descent.”
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
Or the second-person address a few pages previous (757), when Pynchon assassinates us (“you”), complicit with Richard Milhous Nixon: “Your guts in a spasm, you reach for the knob of the AM radio. ‘I don’t think—‘“
(I don’t think therefore I am not).
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
(Or is this just the death-fantasy Zhlubb/Nixon admits to: All theater?)
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
(Oh and hell Zhlubb’s adenoid?!)
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
Where was I—?
Okay: So: Well:
That dash at the end—an invitation back to the beginning?
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
The questions I have are many, and many of the questions I have might result from attending to sections of the plot (Slothrop, Roger and Jessica, Pointsman’s complaints) at the expense of attending to other sections of the plot (Blicero, Enzian).
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
But the rhetorical technique hides the plot, like Slothrop’s desk buried under mounds of detritus. (And this is the aesthetic pleasure of reading Gravity’s Rainbow).
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
Aesthetics though: Light and sound: This is a major element of the plot that I need to attend to in my rereading.
□ □ □ □ □ □ □
So: I put a lot of question marks in this riff (and I threaten to write more as I reread)—so I’ll end with a question:
Good books/essays (preferably not-too-academic-in-tone) about Gravity’s Rainbow, dear readers?
Tagged: Books, conclusion, Gravity's Rainbow, Literature, Reviews, riffs, Thomas Pynchon
